Stephen D’Evelyn on 2016: Both/And!

It’s New Year’s Eve. When I pan out as it were, a broader view makes me wonder what may be next for the trends in culture. Postmodernism’s illusions–irony, scepticism, consumerism–are still evolving. In some ways they offer impoortant correctives to other modes of expression and understanding. But what next?

One answer may be paradox. Recent developments in disability theory such as Tobin Siebers’s work to reblaance the socail model of disability to include the physical suffering experienced by disabled people signals a return to the body. So too phenomena such as the popularity of mindfulness suggests the wider appeal of re-grounding life in corporeal reality. Public art, once dominated by the Christian story, now increasingly evokes ‘life moments’.

Such changes seem to point beyond postmodernism’s deliberate artificiality towards microcosms of particularity. In some sense this continues postmodernism’s empashsi on the atomized self. but perhaps we shall also find how paricularity also means universality. An idnividual’s life moments must be shared by a viewer or an audience to be art. The individual and the community are boudn together. And it seems impossible to reduce what holds them together to simple univocal meaning or to biology. Richard Dawkins has started to wonder publicly at the way his responses of wonder are inexplicable. Maybe we are heading for a remaking of paradox, the both-and that can build on insights into mirrors, plasticity, and neon while affording a new understanding of the ground beneath her feet as the gift of fertility from nowhere.


4 thoughts on “Stephen D’Evelyn on 2016: Both/And!

  1. If you’re into ‘both/and’, read the chapter “More Than Both” in Gary Zukav’s “The Dancing Wu Li Masters.” The whole book deals with the paradox. Also, in a more lighthearted vein, check out this week’s New Yorker cartoon on page 68! Paradox!!!


    • I am terribly sorry that you don’t want any more of these messages. Of course I won’t send any, but I would be really grateful to know what in particular makes you feel this way. The last thing I want is to make people unhappy. Please do let me know. Thank you.


  2. I think you are a kind person who is doing good work and saying good things. However, this medium does not allow for full conversation. Awhile back someone said something untrue and hurtful about me on his twitter, saying it was okay because he didn’t use my name. He didn’t seem to understand that I knew he was saying something way off about me. I became wary and very aware of his other judgements and subtle criticisms about me and I eventually lost trust in that person. A full and real conversation rather than these internet venues would have perhaps produced a better outcome.

    Keep doing your good work. I have enjoyed hearing what you think, but this format, as is right now, is not good for me. It has nothing to do with you personally.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s